The last time I saw a 3D movie I was unimpressed. No, it wasn't Avatar, I knew I wouldn't like that enough to warrant the effort. This was quite possibly decades ago. I can't even think what movie it was, but I remember blaming it on my glasses (and the ridiculous myopia that requires them). So, as I prepared to see Alice in Wonderland, I was ready to be disappointed, and also prepared visually. Contact lenses!
I don't wear contacts often any more (I wore then full-time for 8 years before switching back to spectacles), but last Sunday I was fresh (well, freshly showered) from walking Round the Bays (in a very respectable 93 minutes and 16 seconds) where I needed my contacts so I could wear my sunglasses. Quite fortuitous!
Anyway, as anyone who has seen a 3D movie lately knows, it's much better now! Even the previews for the other upcoming 3D movies were well done). Still, I couldn't help but wonder if, with all the effort that goes into the technical production, the story and acting would be as good.
I'm not really sure it was, but in the end I don't think it mattered. It was good, and we all (two chicks in their thirties, and a 16 and 18 year old) thought so. It's not the best movie I've seen all year, but I'm glad I made the effort.
I enjoyed the costuming (despite the remarkable elasticity of Alice's dress), it's visually stunning, the voices enchanting, and the story darker and more true to the original book than any animated fair we've been fed before. It's dark and quirky - just as you'd expect from Tim Burton. Tweedles Dum and Dee were fabulous, and along with the plucky Dormouse and the wild March Hare, my favourite characters by far.
Alice in Wonderland is showing everywhere, in 2D, 3D and 3D IMAX. It's rated PG. Probably not suitable for little kiddies, but I don't have any, so who am I to judge? Make the effort to see it in 3D.
Recent Comments